From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jul 12 20:00:05 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F02A106564A
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 12 Jul 2012 20:00:05 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [89.206.35.99])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8940A8FC15
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 12 Jul 2012 20:00:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q6CJxxMw003585;
	Thu, 12 Jul 2012 21:59:59 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost)
	by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id
	q6CJxx6l003581; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 21:59:59 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 21:59:59 +0200 (CEST)
From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
To: kpneal@pobox.com
In-Reply-To: <20120712191306.GA24943@neutralgood.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1207122157140.3570@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
References: <CAPj0R5KJ=0yFcQG5azYfCS73oWLAfJhf4NpAz5Oozo4N-vYQyg@mail.gmail.com>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1207121940400.2744@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
	<CAPj0R5KsUdM6LsrtvDzSVBScO9k-TFoa=D6O6ghsch0Y-iNx+Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<20120712191306.GA24943@neutralgood.org>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7
	(wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [127.0.0.1]);
	Thu, 12 Jul 2012 21:59:59 +0200 (CEST)
Cc: Kaya Saman <kayasaman@gmail.com>,
	freebsd-questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re:  Is there a way to run FreeBSD ports through port 80?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 20:00:05 -0000

> Does your IT director understand the active/passive distinction? If not

>From what he described his director is plain moron. He required him to 
block things that HE needs to work, leaving port 80 open so things that 
are best in distracting from work (youtube, facebook...) works, as well as 
major virus source.

In places i work i was requested to

a) block some websites (facebook always first on list - very good).
b) block most things EXCEPT the ones needed for work, full access only 
for some people. So some ports and some targets do work, rest does not.

This is normal IMHO.