From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jul 1 15:15:42 1996 Return-Path: owner-stable Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id PAA21156 for stable-outgoing; Mon, 1 Jul 1996 15:15:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from GndRsh.aac.dev.com (GndRsh.aac.dev.com [198.145.92.241]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id PAA21127 for ; Mon, 1 Jul 1996 15:15:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from rgrimes@localhost) by GndRsh.aac.dev.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id PAA29225; Mon, 1 Jul 1996 15:15:06 -0700 From: "Rodney W. Grimes" Message-Id: <199607012215.PAA29225@GndRsh.aac.dev.com> Subject: Re: Update 2.1-STABLE -> 2.1.5-RELEASE To: nate@mt.sri.com (Nate Williams) Date: Mon, 1 Jul 1996 15:15:06 -0700 (PDT) Cc: branson@widomaker.com, nate@mt.sri.com, chris@acme1.ruhr.de, stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <199607011958.NAA11078@rocky.mt.sri.com> from Nate Williams at "Jul 1, 96 01:58:11 pm" X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL11 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-stable@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > >> Ok, now that 2.1.5-BETA is out, there is still one > > question left: Will >> there be an easy way to updgrade from > > 2.1-STABLE to 2.1.5-RELEASE ? > > > > > > Umm, 2.1-STABLE *isn't* a release and is (was) an ong oing version. > > > Since 2.1-STABLE existed for a *long* time and not a 'checkpoint' > > > release it would be very difficult to provide a singl e 'upgrade' > > > target given your constraints below. > > > > Ummm.. i disagree.. many of us .. who don't have the time, energy, or > > bandwidth or desire to run the -stable tree have stood by with the > > 2.1-RELEASE just as it came from the CD. And I for one would like to > > see an upgrade path as opposed to a re-installation. > > As I understand it, there *IS* an upgrade path from 2.1R. Jordan would > know more. However, the original poster asked for a CTM upgrade from > 2.1-STABLE -> 2.1.5, and there isn't any '2.1-STABLE' release to upgrade > from. Also, creating a 'CTM' diff between 2.1R and 2.1.5 would be > *HUGE*, probably bigger than downloading the entire release, so if you > want the new sources you're more than welcome to download the entire new > release and do a 'make world' and then hand-upgrade the /etc files by > hand. This is essentially what the 2.1R -> 2.1.5 'upgrade' would do > anyway. cvs rdiff -u -rRELENG_2_1_0_RELEASE -rRELENG_2_1_0 src GndRsh:rgrimes {215} ls -lag BIG.diff -rw-rw-r-- 1 rgrimes rgrimes 11171459 Jul 1 14:51 BIG.diff GndRsh:rgrimes {218} df /usr/src Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/sd0g 158863 127050 19103 87% /usr/src 11MB vs ~127MB for a full src tree, both uncompressed, but compression should still keep the same 10:1 relative size difference. -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com Accurate Automation Company Reliable computers for FreeBSD