From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jan  6 21:22:16 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C43934A1
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Tue,  6 Jan 2015 21:22:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA0F664D02
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Tue,  6 Jan 2015 21:22:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t06LMG5v016316
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 6 Jan 2015 21:22:16 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 196236] graphics/shotwell: Segmentation fault
Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2015 21:22:16 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages
X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s)
X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-patch, needs-qa
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me
X-Bugzilla-Who: cmt@burggraben.net
X-Bugzilla-Status: New
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback?
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-196236-13-GSWMgdr0t6@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-196236-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-196236-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2015 21:22:16 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196236

--- Comment #8 from cmt@burggraben.net ---
(In reply to tonymaher from comment #7)

Ah, now... I completely missed that you have the ancient gcc as a default
compiler (I'm on FreeBSD 10.1, so I've got clang since 10BETA or so).
So I think it's not a case of "clang vs. gcc" (you would need to switch the
default compiler on your own for that, I don't think official packages would be
built that way), but it's totally possible that "some update" (there was the
huge GNOME-update, including vala, for example) made shotwell or one of it's
dependencies trigger a bug in the ancient gcc or it's libraries.
I think it might be neccessary to force USE_GCC at least on FreeBSD 9. I'll
have to check if there are drawbacks if I set USE_GCC unconditionally.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.