From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 6 14:09:02 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F12316A41F for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2005 14:09:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from malachid@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F133243D48 for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2005 14:09:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from malachid@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 36so1191002wra for ; Tue, 06 Sep 2005 07:09:00 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=tZVZDjhDpJqxelsximfcBFFE32Wq++wLBWEoNoKciwCAa82lCOhLMMCkrLOXZPvDCBEu1axSqlDmLqEOfvGb1DcpFdZdcjEm5PnG7DaryZKH/ATBeJekN3a9QElNVAIk+CCN/dfY1oIIGUYpoZKrQvgqh0Eb/iM8L348OuXaYmo= Received: by 10.54.29.44 with SMTP id c44mr1375466wrc; Tue, 06 Sep 2005 07:08:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.79.1 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Sep 2005 07:08:59 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2005 07:08:59 -0700 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Malachi_de_=C6lfweald?= To: "O. Hartmann" In-Reply-To: <431D90E1.1030105@mail.uni-mainz.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <431D90E1.1030105@mail.uni-mainz.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nForce4-SLI, AHCI and NCQ and FreeBSD 6.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2005 14:09:02 -0000 I have noticed the same thing with the onboard Silicon Image controller. I= =20 am using the A8N-SLI Premium. I am using the Silicon Image controller=20 instead of the nForce4 controller because it specifically said SATAII and= =20 said it supported RAID5 (whereas the nForce did not support RAID5). However= ,=20 on boot it recognizes it as SATA150 (which should be SATA300). Malachi On 9/6/05, O. Hartmann wrote: >=20 > Hello. > I have a little question about the popular nForce4-SLI chipset for the > Socket 939 platform. The onboard SATA controller of the nForce4-SLI > chipset claims to be NCQ (or SATA II) capable, but nVidia implemented > this feature in a not-AHCI-standardised way, but as an own solution. My > question is: Is the FBSD 6.X driver for the nForce4-SLI chipset capable > of using NCQ (as I know, the driver has to enable NCQ and it's not done > automatically by the harddrive-controller interaction). >=20 > Thanks in advance, > Oliver > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >