Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 19:13:14 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: gecko@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 238482] www/firefox: 67.0_3,1 print pre-formatting is HORRIBLE Message-ID: <bug-238482-21738-0dCCqi4LTm@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-238482-21738@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-238482-21738@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D238482 Jan Beich <jbeich@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |Works As Intended Flags|maintainer-feedback?(gecko@ |maintainer-feedback+ |FreeBSD.org) | Status|Open |Closed --- Comment #6 from Jan Beich <jbeich@FreeBSD.org> --- Bitmap fonts simply don't support anti-aliasing and generally only look goo= d at very low resolutions. Firefox selects non-embedded fonts according to fonts-conf(5). Bug 225744 tried to make behavior match Ubuntu by default but apparently some users like how bitmap fonts look. To see the list of bitmap fonts run "fc-list :scalable=3Dfalse". To check if they'd be used by default run "fc-match serif", "fc-match sans-serif", "fc-match monospace". fontconfig behavior can be adjusted without creating fonts-conf(5) files simply by symlinking desired files from conf.avail/ to conf.d/ under /usr/local/etc/fonts/. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-238482-21738-0dCCqi4LTm>