Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2017 20:14:23 +1300 From: Jonathan Chen <jonc@chen.org.nz> To: Patrick Dorion <dorionpatrick@outlook.com> Cc: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Firefox (Doesn't) Build Message-ID: <CAJuc1zM1JqzYYUOHTP=VpAqi6Rz%2BEvGAW6OyODsg9W_mjH6xMg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <BL2PR05MB22748A248A96B4ECBE5E40EBBB550@BL2PR05MB2274.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> References: <BL2PR05MB2274B42AD1B2CFE4B5215767BB550@BL2PR05MB2274.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <BL2PR05MB22748A248A96B4ECBE5E40EBBB550@BL2PR05MB2274.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12 November 2017 at 12:16, Patrick Dorion <dorionpatrick@outlook.com> wrote: > What's the difference between using Poudriere or Synth, though? > > This is a clean system, I can't imagine a jail being cleaner... it was unpacked from the DVD the day before yesterday.... Both are clean room builds; ie where only minimal build dependancies are installed for each port build. The main difference is that: * poudriere uses jails to achieve this * synth uses unionfs+chroot to achieve this Cheers. -- Jonathan Chen <jonc@chen.org.nz>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJuc1zM1JqzYYUOHTP=VpAqi6Rz%2BEvGAW6OyODsg9W_mjH6xMg>