From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 5 06:26:23 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C13937B401; Tue, 5 Aug 2003 06:26:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E843043F75; Tue, 5 Aug 2003 06:26:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from oliver@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (oliver@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h75DQMUp012850; Tue, 5 Aug 2003 06:26:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from oliver@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from oliver@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h75DQM5U012846; Tue, 5 Aug 2003 06:26:22 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 06:26:22 -0700 (PDT) From: Oliver Lehmann Message-Id: <200308051326.h75DQM5U012846@freefall.freebsd.org> To: thorsten.greiner@web.de, oliver@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/55255: Update: x11-wm/xfce4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2003 13:26:23 -0000 Synopsis: Update: x11-wm/xfce4 State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: oliver State-Changed-When: Tue Aug 5 06:23:19 PDT 2003 State-Changed-Why: I don't like the solution to put every related xfce4 port into that meta port. I think these meta port should only take care about packages provided from xfce.org and are included in the xfce release. External developed software shouldn't appear in that por. (That would be like every gnome2 related software gets installed by installing the gnome2 meta port.) http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=55255