Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 23:43:25 -0700 From: "Crist J . Clark" <cjclark@reflexnet.net> To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <n@nectar.com>, freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fwd: eth-security : ANNOUNCE : Resources no for ALL Message-ID: <20001004234325.E25121@149.211.6.64.reflexcom.com> In-Reply-To: <20001004114308.B23379@hamlet.nectar.com>; from n@nectar.com on Wed, Oct 04, 2000 at 11:43:08AM -0500 References: <20001004084729.C25121@149.211.6.64.reflexcom.com> <20001004114308.B23379@hamlet.nectar.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Oct 04, 2000 at 11:43:08AM -0500, Jacques A. Vidrine wrote: > On Wed, Oct 04, 2000 at 08:47:29AM -0700, Crist J . Clark wrote: > > This was posted to BugTraq yesterday. It is a series of patches to > > restrict certain information from non-priv'ed users. > > man jail I should have put the original author of the scripts in the mail so he would get the replies. I just posted them since I thought they would be of interest and was curious about what others thought of the idea. Since I am not running any multi-user machines right now, they are not of particular interest to me. But anyway, jail(8) is a very different beast from the patches. It is not practical to put each interactive user in a jail for, say, a several dozen or several hundered user system. -- Crist J. Clark cjclark@alum.mit.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001004234325.E25121>