From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Feb 25 20:32:57 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9315416A400
	for <freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>;
	Sun, 25 Feb 2007 20:32:57 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org)
Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F8F113C4A7
	for <freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>;
	Sun, 25 Feb 2007 20:32:57 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org)
Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196])
	by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDAD21A3C1A;
	Sun, 25 Feb 2007 12:32:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 4B3635195F; Sun, 25 Feb 2007 15:32:53 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 15:32:53 -0500
From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To: Petri Helenius <pete@he.iki.fi>
Message-ID: <20070225203252.GB77932@xor.obsecurity.org>
References: <20070224215508.GA41968@xor.obsecurity.org>
	<45E13410.7020505@he.iki.fi>
	<20070225071946.GA48242@xor.obsecurity.org>
	<45E14BAD.80909@he.iki.fi>
	<20070225084737.GA49231@xor.obsecurity.org>
	<errjlr$a8p$1@sea.gmane.org>
	<20070225092947.GA49489@xor.obsecurity.org>
	<ersqpj$9u$1@sea.gmane.org>
	<20070225202058.GA77835@xor.obsecurity.org>
	<45E1F0EA.2030605@he.iki.fi>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <45E1F0EA.2030605@he.iki.fi>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i
Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org, Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr>,
	Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Subject: Re: Progress on scaling of FreeBSD on 8 CPU systems
X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Performance/tuning <freebsd-performance.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance>,
	<mailto:freebsd-performance-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-performance>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-performance-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance>,
	<mailto:freebsd-performance-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 20:32:57 -0000

On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 10:26:18PM +0200, Petri Helenius wrote:
> Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >
> >I'm saying that the 7.0-CVS sources, which are graphed, are unlikely
> >to differ significantly from 6.2-CVS, i.e. they do not show good
> >scaling on this benchmark because of the problems with filedesc
> >locking in CVS.
> >
> >  
> Could you give a link to the 7.0-CVS graph?

http://obsecurity.dyndns.org/holycrap.png

Some of the data is old (e.g. the Linux curve is normalized too high
because I was trying to compare it from another machine and the
baseline comparison was wrong), but all the FreeBSD data is from the
same machine.

Kris