From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 28 12:39:46 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B6D6106566B for ; Wed, 28 May 2008 12:39:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from iaccounts@ibctech.ca) Received: from ibctech.ca (unknown [IPv6:2607:f118::b6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C0DEE8FC23 for ; Wed, 28 May 2008 12:39:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from iaccounts@ibctech.ca) Received: (qmail 76271 invoked by uid 89); 28 May 2008 08:39:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?IPv6:2607:f118::5?) (steve@ibctech.ca@2607:f118::5) by v6.ibctech.ca with ESMTPA; 28 May 2008 08:39:58 -0000 Message-ID: <483D5219.1020802@ibctech.ca> Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 08:37:45 -0400 From: Steve Bertrand User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David DeSimone References: <483C169D.7030304@ibctech.ca> <20080527192509.GB8554@verio.net> In-Reply-To: <20080527192509.GB8554@verio.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Dual stack with multiple addresses in rc.conf X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 12:39:46 -0000 David DeSimone wrote: > Steve Bertrand wrote: >> ifconfig_fxp0="inet6 2607:f118::b6 prefixlen 64" >> ifconfig_fxp0_alias0="inet6 2607:f118::b7 prefixlen 64" >> ifconfig_fxp0="inet 208.70.104.210 255.255.255.248" >> ifconfig_fxp0_alias1="inet 208.70.104.211 netmask 255.255.255.255" > > Your config entry for ifconfig_fxp0 is specified twice, so the latter > setting overrides the former. When you have multiple settings to apply, > you can put them all in one ifconfig entry, although as Max points out, > it is more correct to put IPV6 settings in a separate entry. The example above was just that...I had tried numerous possibilities, however what I neglected to do was RTFM, which is unlike myself. Anyway, thanks for the responses. I haven't put the config into place yet, but will today. Regards, Steve