Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 26 Jan 2017 19:38:42 +0330
From:      mokhi <mokhi64@gmail.com>
To:        Jan Beich <jbeich@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: correct way of using autoreconf and automake
Message-ID:  <CAByVWPXNoyCKHXYoK-02g_B2_weQLvZGfWc5ME-eJS=UnJA-Qg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20170126152718.7F02D31FC@freefall.freebsd.org>
References:  <CAByVWPX9Th0N85a69y9LeF%2Bz7zF4V7i9PftVZ%2B6B9AXCiLwTEA@mail.gmail.com> <20170126152718.7F02D31FC@freefall.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>  Can you pass -w flag to poudriere bulk command then inspect the specific line?
My guess was correct,
As I previously told, the generated `configure` script in first `make`
run and in second, differs.

>  The error often originates from undefined macros provided by other packages e.g.,
Yeah, as far as I understood, the `PKG_CHECK_MODULES` is not
translated to its definition in first run.
But the weird point for me is that why it will be corrected in second
run (inside the jail)?

This is the first generated script[1] and the second[2] if you wanna check'em.
Any opinion?

Best wishes, Mokhi.
===============================
[1] dpaste.de/jZW1
[2] dpaste.de/Gu2H



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAByVWPXNoyCKHXYoK-02g_B2_weQLvZGfWc5ME-eJS=UnJA-Qg>