From owner-freebsd-current Tue Jan 4 20:58:49 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mailman.zeta.org.au (mailman.zeta.org.au [203.26.10.16]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88D61150CD for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2000 20:58:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bde@zeta.org.au) Received: from bde.zeta.org.au (beefcake.zeta.org.au [203.26.10.12]) by mailman.zeta.org.au (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA17598; Wed, 5 Jan 2000 15:58:36 +1100 Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2000 15:58:34 +1100 (EST) From: Bruce Evans X-Sender: bde@alphplex.bde.org To: Ollivier Robert Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: new man pages In-Reply-To: <20000105005118.B61676@keltia.freenix.fr> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 5 Jan 2000, Ollivier Robert wrote: > According to Rodney W. Grimes: > > xntpd was recently renamed ntpd, but the documentation and manual > > pages was not. > > > You'll find the manual page for ntpd with a ``man xntpd''. Those are the old man pages. You're not running -current if you have them :-). > > And a side note for PHK. Could you change the rm -f /usr/sbin/xntpd > > to instead replace /usr/sbin/xntpd with a LINK to ntpd for maximal > > I discussed that with Poul-Henning, Peter and David. I do not think that it is > a good idea because: I think it's a better idea than removing xntpd (not very good). We normally don't remove old commands when their sources go away. It clutters the makefiles and might remove a local copy of the command. It is the responsibilty of the upgrader to remove old commands and their infrastructure. Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message