From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 6 12:16:37 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7584916A403 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 12:16:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daniel_k_eriksson@telia.com) Received: from pne-smtpout1-sn2.hy.skanova.net (pne-smtpout1-sn2.hy.skanova.net [81.228.8.83]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A8F313C494 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 12:16:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daniel_k_eriksson@telia.com) Received: from royal64.emp.zapto.org (195.198.193.104) by pne-smtpout1-sn2.hy.skanova.net (7.2.075) id 45B61FED00AD0BE1; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 12:07:31 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 12:07:30 +0100 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Message-ID: <4F9C9299A10AE74E89EA580D14AA10A6028719@royal64.emp.zapto.org> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: gjournal and zfs, questions Thread-Index: Acdf37C7AQ6XRWviSpqR41FiHSUtPw== From: "Daniel Eriksson" To: Cc: pjd@FreeBSD.org Subject: gjournal and zfs, questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 12:16:37 -0000 Is gjournal and/or zfs stable enough for production-like usage yet? I've got a 3.5TB filesystem that I'd rather not have to fsck in case of a crash or power outage. I can live with running CURRENT on this box as long as I know the filesystem is stable. (I'd rather run RELENG_6, but zfs is only for current afaik.) When will gjournal and zfs be committed to the CVS tree? Will either of them be merged to STABLE? /Daniel Eriksson