From owner-freebsd-ports Sat Aug 21 2:38:54 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mail2.netcologne.de (mail2.netcologne.de [194.8.194.103]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 070C014EBE for ; Sat, 21 Aug 1999 02:38:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dr@domix.de) Received: from domix.de (dial2-37.netcologne.de [194.8.195.37]) by mail2.netcologne.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA13211; Sat, 21 Aug 1999 11:38:45 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from dr@localhost) by domix.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id LAA39439; Sat, 21 Aug 1999 11:36:58 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from dr) Date: Sat, 21 Aug 1999 11:36:58 +0200 From: Dominik Rothert To: obrien@NUXI.com Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: nmap suggestion Message-ID: <19990821113658.A39385@speed.localnet.lan> Reply-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.6i X-Encryption: PGP/GnuPG key available X-URL: http://www.domix.de X-OS: FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hello, what about splitting the nmap port into two parts, nmap and nmapfe. Since you need Glib and Gtk+ (because of nmapfe, the Gtk+ based frontend to nmap), not everyone is able to install nmap. Best wishes, Dominik Rothert. -- Dominik Rothert E-Mail: dr@domix.de WWW: http://www.domix.de To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message