From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Nov 21 04:48:06 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 151FA16A4CF
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 04:48:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.seceidos.de (mail.seceidos.de [213.157.28.234])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A368B43FEC
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 04:48:02 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from jan-peter.koopmann@seceidos.de)
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 13:47:54 +0100
Message-ID: <B9D9BD71E387E24AB1D619FE4B748CC70C7CD7@ERWIN.intern.seceidos.de>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: Clamav-0.65 / Linker error on FreeBSD4.8-STABLE
Thread-Index: AcOvn/szejfh3EZ4TDGIWdQAOlHhvQAjakXg
From: "Jan-Peter Koopmann" <Jan-Peter.Koopmann@seceidos.de>
To: "Marius Strobl" <marius@alchemy.franken.de>
X-MailScanner-Seceidos: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: 
cc: ports@freebsd.org
Subject: RE: Clamav-0.65 / Linker error on FreeBSD4.8-STABLE
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 12:48:06 -0000

Hi,

> Could you give http://quad.zeist.de/security_clamav.diff a=20
> try? It should improve and fix some other things like=20
> compilation with the sendmail port and on 5.1-current...

I tried that and it worked like a charm! Thanks!

Regards,
  JP