From owner-freebsd-current Thu Feb 21 11:11:59 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7822C37B400; Thu, 21 Feb 2002 11:11:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by flood.ping.uio.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id 1B3A55341; Thu, 21 Feb 2002 20:11:53 +0100 (CET) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: Bernd Walter Cc: Julian Elischer , Greg Lehey , Peter Wemm , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Perforce repo (was: Patch sets to date and timing tests with Giant out of userret.) References: <20020221124731.Z65817@wantadilla.lemis.com> <20020221033349.GJ51784@cicely8.cicely.de> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 21 Feb 2002 20:11:52 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20020221033349.GJ51784@cicely8.cicely.de> Message-ID: Lines: 14 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/21.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Bernd Walter writes: > There is still missing an overview over the p4 collections. > No - I'm not going to cvsup p4-all - I already had an increasing of > 1G overnight without a single warning. > A p4-self collection is also missing. p4-all is not a good idea - Perforce makes branching very cheap, and the repo reflects that :) There are currently 52 branches, some of which are full copies of the FreeBSD source tree, and some of which only include the kernel sources. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message