From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 11 15:54:40 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D0771065693 for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:54:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from emorras@xroff.net) Received: from xroff.net (xroff.net [200.46.208.231]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEF9A8FC12 for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:54:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from emorras@xroff.net) Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.208.211]) by xroff.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 388324FC976 for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:54:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from xroff.net ([200.46.208.231]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.211]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 18833-09 for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2009 12:54:37 -0300 (ADT) Received: from INV-011.xroff.net (unknown [83.175.204.210]) by xroff.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 47BF94FC80A for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:54:35 +0000 (UTC) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 16:54:31 +0100 To: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org From: Eduardo Morras In-Reply-To: References: <20090311012018.2075c3d9@gom.home> <20090311140247.GE86605@Grumpy.DynDNS.org> <20090311154613.0a90e64b.freebsd@edvax.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <20090311155436.47BF94FC80A@xroff.net> Cc: Subject: Re: bsd vs gpl X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:54:40 -0000 At 16:09 11/03/2009, Wojciech Puchar wrote: >>That's why the GPL is often called a "viral license". As > >GPL is a communist licence. No, even communist are more generous ... ----------------------------------------------- Useful Acronyms: GPL =3D Greedy Peng=FCin Licence=20