From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 18:24:08 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B7E716A4E9 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 18:24:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail21.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail21.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A54443D6E for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 18:24:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 28758 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2005 18:24:07 -0000 Received: from server.baldwin.cx ([216.27.160.63]) (envelope-sender )AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 5 Apr 2005 18:24:06 -0000 Received: from [10.50.41.231] (gw1.twc.weather.com [216.133.140.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by server.baldwin.cx (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j35INtt9067094; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 14:24:00 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) From: John Baldwin To: Dan Cojocar Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 14:23:29 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <200504051030.42657.jhb@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200504051423.29530.jhb@FreeBSD.org> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.8 required=4.2 tests=ALL_TRUSTED, USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=failed version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on server.baldwin.cx cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org cc: Jung-uk Kim Subject: Re: Interrupt storm X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 18:24:08 -0000 On Tuesday 05 April 2005 12:44 pm, Dan Cojocar wrote: > On Apr 5, 2005 5:30 PM, John Baldwin wrote: > > On Tuesday 29 March 2005 01:35 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > > > On Tuesday 29 March 2005 01:22 pm, Dan Cojocar wrote: > > > > Hello all, > > > > > > > > I noticed the following interrupt storm in my dmesg: > > > > > > > > Interrupt storm detected on "irq11: rl1"; throttling interrupt > > > > source Interrupt storm detected on "irq5: rl0"; throttling > > > > interrupt source > > > > > > > > Here is my vmstat -i: > > > > interrupt total rate > > > > irq0: clk 128600 199 > > > > irq1: atkbd0 2499 3 > > > > irq4: sio0 2 0 > > > > irq5: rl0 128901 200 > > > > irq8: rtc 82294 127 > > > > irq11: rl1 128902 200 > > > > irq12: psm0 16152 25 > > > > irq14: ata0 12600 19 > > > > irq15: ata1 71 0 > > > > Total 500021 776 > > > > > > > > and here is my dmesg: > > > > http://cs.ubbcluj.ro/~dan/dmesg.txt > > > > > > > > I have options DEVICE_POLLING and options HZ=200, i have tested > > > > with greater HZ values like 1000, and without DEVICE_POLLING but i > > > > have the same storm. > > > > > > Try this: > > > > > > http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200503161154.04555.jkim > > > > He's not using an APIC so that won't make any difference. > > If I use APIC, I will get "watchdog timeout" as i posted in an old email: > >rl0: watchdog timeout > >rl1: watchdog timeout > >rl0: watchdog timeout > >rl1: watchdog timeout > >rl1: watchdog timeout > >rl1: watchdog timeout > >rl1: watchdog timeout > > Thanks, > Dan That's indicative of other interrupt routing problems. This is with APIC + ACPI, yes? If you disable ACPI, does APIC work or is it not found? Also, if you disable ACPI, does non-APIC work ok? -- John Baldwin <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.org