From owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 19 02:25:45 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D93F1065673 for ; Sat, 19 Feb 2011 02:25:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from spork@bway.net) Received: from xena.bway.net (xena.bway.net [216.220.96.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 696778FC0C for ; Sat, 19 Feb 2011 02:25:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 4092 invoked by uid 0); 19 Feb 2011 01:59:02 -0000 Received: from smtp.bway.net (216.220.96.25) by xena.bway.net with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 19 Feb 2011 01:59:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 4081 invoked by uid 90); 19 Feb 2011 01:59:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hotlap.nat.fasttrackmonkey.com) (spork@96.57.144.66) by smtp.bway.net with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 19 Feb 2011 01:59:02 -0000 Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 20:59:02 -0500 (EST) From: Charles Sprickman X-X-Sender: spork@hotlap.nat.fasttrackmonkey.com To: Dmitry Morozovsky In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20110218164209.GA77903@nargothrond.kdm.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (OSX 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org, "Kenneth D. Merry" Subject: Re: mps(4) driver (LSI 6Gb SAS) commited to stable/8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SCSI subsystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 02:25:45 -0000 On Sat, 19 Feb 2011, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: > On Fri, 18 Feb 2011, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > KDM> I just merged the mps(4) driver to stable/8, for those of you with LSI 6Gb > KDM> SAS hardware. > > [snip] > > Again, thank you very much Ken. I'm planning to stress test this on 846 case > filled with 12 (yet) WD RE4 disks organized as raidz2, and will post the > results. > > Any hints to particularly I/O stressing patterns? Out of my mind, I'm planning > multiple parallel -j'ed builds, parallel tars, *SQL benchmarks -- what else > could you suppose? benchmarks/iozone is nice, and you can get nifty graphs out of it. It walks through various block sizes and is very long running. It can probably tickle lots of stuff. The results are also pretty informative - you can see very clearly in the graphs whatever your weak spots are. http://www.iozone.org/ Charles > > -- > Sincerely, > D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] > [ FreeBSD committer: marck@FreeBSD.org ] > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >