Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 23:52:25 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 255764] ports-mgmt/portlint: portlint-2.19.5 report FATAL DISTFILES_${ARCH} place Message-ID: <bug-255764-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D255764 Bug ID: 255764 Summary: ports-mgmt/portlint: portlint-2.19.5 report FATAL DISTFILES_${ARCH} place Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Only Me Priority: --- Component: Individual Port(s) Assignee: marcus@FreeBSD.org Reporter: tatsuki_makino@hotmail.com Flags: maintainer-feedback?(marcus@FreeBSD.org) Assignee: marcus@FreeBSD.org In attachment 224746 of bug 255680 I submitted a Makefile that portlint says looks fine. But it has been corrected and committed according to the portclippy in ports-mgmt/portfmt. Which is the right one to follow? Bug 255680 comment #8 has all the results of using portlint in a Makefile t= hat follows portclippy. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-255764-7788>