From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 6 00:01:24 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 704C716A41F for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2005 00:01:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tomstdenis@gmail.com) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04D7943D4C for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2005 00:01:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tomstdenis@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a41so997071rng for ; Mon, 05 Sep 2005 17:01:23 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=l8Nue3uHYsl/z1UiSC5Tc0M+i8+sMZDvy8pliCPGsDL5uMrnfeR7skgXuf0W4pDKRgj84KAfIJ+n7ZbrFwFo8VW26rSyKW76O/p6XqEcHZHe7HgGVNixTAHmaQ/Hqozu+M0NM8comkzaFs60VKhJ/Vl8COLhknJuUNCuBGDbJvw= Received: by 10.11.88.37 with SMTP id l37mr41858cwb; Mon, 05 Sep 2005 17:01:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.11.100.73 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Sep 2005 17:01:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2005 20:01:23 -0400 From: Tom St Denis To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20050905235554.GA93379@dragon.NUXI.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20050905235554.GA93379@dragon.NUXI.org> Cc: shellreef+freebsd@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] LibTomCrypt on amd64 and -fPIC X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2005 00:01:24 -0000 On 9/5/05, David O'Brien wrote: > On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 07:18:18PM -0700, shellreef@gmail.com wrote: > > To FreeBSD-amd64: Can we add -fPIC to make.conf? Are there any > > side-effects? (I'd prefer this as I use packages and would prefer to > > not compile from ports.) >=20 > No. -fPIC should only be used to build shared libraries. Not every > since piece of code compiled for AMD64. If the library doesn't build without -fPIC it's because they're using a custom compiler. I've built LTC on 4.0.1, 3.4.4, 3.3.6 and 2.96 boxes [it isn't stable on 4.01, 3.3.6 but it at least builds]. Tom