From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Mar 22 19:01:03 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id TAA25407 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 22 Mar 1995 19:01:03 -0800 Received: from gndrsh.aac.dev.com (gndrsh.aac.dev.com [198.145.92.241]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id TAA25399 for ; Wed, 22 Mar 1995 19:00:58 -0800 Received: (from rgrimes@localhost) by gndrsh.aac.dev.com (8.6.8/8.6.6) id TAA11250; Wed, 22 Mar 1995 19:00:31 -0800 From: "Rodney W. Grimes" Message-Id: <199503230300.TAA11250@gndrsh.aac.dev.com> Subject: Re: sup average size To: steve2@genesis.tiac.net (Steve Gerakines) Date: Wed, 22 Mar 1995 19:00:30 -0800 (PST) Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <199503222025.UAA18003@genesis.tiac.net> from "Steve Gerakines" at Mar 22, 95 08:25:42 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 605 Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > I am considering keeping my system up to date running -current. Is it > feasible to do this over a 14.4K slip dialup? I plan on checking in > about every 24-48 hours. Any idea what an average transfer size > would be for sup if I updated within that inverval? Depends on what goes on with the tree, if you want absolute minium transfer sizes ctm is the way to go via email, though it has problems on rare occasion (but then, so does sup). -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com Accurate Automation Company Custom computers for FreeBSD