Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 18:48:33 +0200 From: Luciano Mannucci <luciano@vespaperitivo.it> To: FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: NAT question Message-ID: <3hYH0x3vTtzCy1h@baobab.bilink.it>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello, I'm still migrating machines from linux to FreeBSD. I'm wondering if my translation from this iptables linux rule iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.7.234/32 -d 172.16.1.0/24 -o eth1 -j MASQUERADE (which means moreless if Mr 192.168.7.234 wherever he comes fom passes through our eth1 interface to go to 172.16.1 network should get our eth1 address instead of his) is moreless correctly translated in FreeBSD ipnat rules as map em0 192.168.7.234/32 -> 0/32 or I'm missing something? Cheers, Luciano. -- /"\ /Via A. Salaino, 7 - 20144 Milano (Italy) \ / ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN / PHONE : +39 2 485781 FAX: +39 2 48578250 X AGAINST HTML MAIL / E-MAIL: posthamster@sublink.sublink.ORG / \ AND POSTINGS / WWW: http://www.lesassaie.IT/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3hYH0x3vTtzCy1h>