From owner-freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Tue Sep 20 23:55:32 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBB41BE3AEF for ; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 23:55:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Received: from vps1.elischer.org (vps1.elischer.org [204.109.63.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "vps1.elischer.org", Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B851AD17; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 23:55:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Received: from julian-mbp3.pixel8networks.com (50-196-156-133-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.196.156.133]) (authenticated bits=0) by vps1.elischer.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id u8KNtTZd074112 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 20 Sep 2016 16:55:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Subject: Re: number of xen block devices To: Colin Percival , freebsd-xen@freebsd.org References: <73fad119-03d8-a9ea-c222-f65b22c6feac@freebsd.org> <010001574a0207f9-d12e326c-e152-49f9-9763-2cf0161f7458-000000@email.amazonses.com> Cc: Alexander Motin , =?UTF-8?Q?Roger_Pau_Monn=c3=a9?= From: Julian Elischer Message-ID: <3132e8d0-68db-940f-5cb1-22fe01b52480@freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 16:55:24 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <010001574a0207f9-d12e326c-e152-49f9-9763-2cf0161f7458-000000@email.amazonses.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 23:55:32 -0000 On 20/09/2016 4:50 PM, Colin Percival wrote: > On 09/20/16 16:33, Julian Elischer wrote: >> Is there a maximum number of block devices supported for an AMI type >> installation? > Does "AMI type installation" mean EC2? yes > >> Our tests a while back showed a limit of 14. >> >> Has that changed in 10.3? >> >> If not is it an artificial limit we can get past by simply recompiling something? > There was a bug a while back which resulted in high-numbered xbd > devices not showing up; I fixed that three years ago in r255051, > shortly before stable/10 branched. that may be what we were seeing. I'll know in a few days. >