From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 22 21:13:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B0E916A4E6; Thu, 22 Jun 2006 21:13:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from server.baldwin.cx (66-23-211-162.clients.speedfactory.net [66.23.211.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C37645815; Thu, 22 Jun 2006 20:52:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from localhost.corp.yahoo.com (john@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by server.baldwin.cx (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k5MKqMCE051151; Thu, 22 Jun 2006 16:52:26 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) From: John Baldwin To: Alfred Perlstein Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 16:27:06 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <200606070333.k573XmRc067920@repoman.freebsd.org> <200606201516.39121.jhb@freebsd.org> <20060622170955.GY95135@elvis.mu.org> In-Reply-To: <20060622170955.GY95135@elvis.mu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200606221627.07495.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (server.baldwin.cx [127.0.0.1]); Thu, 22 Jun 2006 16:52:26 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.87.1/1561/Thu Jun 22 11:40:00 2006 on server.baldwin.cx X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=4.2 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on server.baldwin.cx Cc: Tom Rhodes , src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, obrien@freebsd.org, cvs-src@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src Makefile README X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 21:13:41 -0000 On Thursday 22 June 2006 13:09, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > * John Baldwin [060620 13:31] wrote: > > On Tuesday 20 June 2006 14:53, David O'Brien wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 07:43:00PM -0400, Tom Rhodes wrote: > > > > Personally, I was debating on just removing most of the > > > > world target with just a message: > > > > > > > > "The world target has been replaced with the buildworld target." > > > > > > No! > > > > > > 'make world' is still my normal building process. Why force > > > "make buildworld && make installworld"?? > > > > > > I don't care how undocumented it is, or obfusacted > > > 'HISTORICAL_MAKE_WORLD' is; but please leave them alone! > > > > > > thanks for your attention. > > > > You can already get that via 'make DESTDIR=/ world' you know. :) And that's > > shorter to type. > > I think I'm missing something. > > Is the only difference between "make world" and: > > "make buildworld buildkernel installkernel installworld" > > That make world has the order of installs flipped? No, make world doesn't include the kernel stuff at all, and the "supported" order (read, if you do it different that's fine, just don't ask for help if you break something :) is to do buildworld, buildkernel, installkernel, reboot into single user mode, installworld. -- John Baldwin