From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 25 20:32:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFAF616A422 for ; Sat, 25 Feb 2006 20:32:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CFF343D46 for ; Sat, 25 Feb 2006 20:32:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from [192.168.254.11] (junior.samsco.home [192.168.254.11]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1PKWC2U026301; Sat, 25 Feb 2006 13:32:12 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Message-ID: <4400BECB.8080406@samsco.org> Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 13:32:11 -0700 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20051230 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Markus Brueffer References: <43FF986E.9030205@savvis.net> <200602251538.54403.markus@brueffer.de> <4400840F.3030807@savvis.net> <200602251811.50530.markus@brueffer.de> In-Reply-To: <200602251811.50530.markus@brueffer.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=3.8 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on pooker.samsco.org Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] kbdmux(4) update X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 20:32:24 -0000 Markus Brueffer wrote: > Am Saturday 25 February 2006 17:21 schrieb Maksim Yevmenkin: > >>>>the following patch should fix the problem with kbdmux(4). please give >>>>it a try and let me know if it works for you. >>> >>>[...] >>> >>>Great work! With this patch I'm currently working since half an hour with >>>a PS/2 mouse, a Bluetooth mouse, a PS/2 keyboard and a Bluetooth mouse in >>>parallel without any ill effects. Without it, the machine froze within >>>seconds. >> >>cool, thanks for the report. btw, did you mean "ps/2 keyboard and a >>bluetooth keyboard" (not mouse) above? or you really have 2 bluetooth >>mice going at the same time? > > > Actually I meant "ps/2 keyboard and a bluetooth keyboard", but I did a little > bit of further testing and now have: > > - one Logitech ps/2 mouse > - one Logitech MX1000 bluetooth mouse > - two Logitech MX900 bluetooth mice > - one Cherry ps/2 keyboard > - one Logitech MX5000 bluetooth keyboard > > working in parallel flawlessly :) I would say: Awesome work Maksim! > > >>>Btw: I'm getting LORs from vkbd(4) when working with the bluetooth >>>keyboard (6-STABLE from about an hour ago with the kndmux patch): >> >>thanks for reporting this. it has nothing to do with the kdbmux(4) >>patch. it has been there for quite a long time. i will fix it. > > > Thanks! > > Markus > This is definitely something worth getting into 6.1. Scott