From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Feb 28 13:46:43 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id NAA16296 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 28 Feb 1996 13:46:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from nervosa.com (root@nervosa.com [192.187.228.86]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id NAA16269 for ; Wed, 28 Feb 1996 13:46:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from nervosa.com (coredump@onyx.nervosa.com [10.0.0.1]) by nervosa.com (8.7.4/nervosa.com.2) with SMTP id NAA21077; Wed, 28 Feb 1996 13:45:42 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 28 Feb 1996 13:45:42 -0800 (PST) From: invalid opcode To: David Greenman cc: "Amancio Hasty Jr." , "Jordan K. Hubbard" , Stephen Hocking , hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Quake's out, where's that Linux ELF emulation? In-Reply-To: <199602280803.AAA05147@Root.COM> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Wed, 28 Feb 1996, David Greenman wrote: > No, that would be *extremely* childish and bad business to boot. Besides, > You can put me on record as saying that I think it's very bad policy to > sink to the levels of the Linux fanatics. > > David Greenman I totally agree with that. We shouldn't drop to id's level in order to make them look stupid. Also, if one looks in quake talk, whatever the latest version is, id has said multiple times that the source code for the server will be avaliable, but the source for the client will not. At this point, it looks like we can run a Quake server on FreeBSD if this is the case. I may be wrong. == Chris Layne ============================================================== == coredump@nervosa.com ================= http://www.nervosa.com/~coredump ==