From owner-freebsd-current Wed Nov 25 10:43:00 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA27932 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Wed, 25 Nov 1998 10:43:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from bright.fx.genx.net (bright.fx.genx.net [206.64.4.154]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA27926 for ; Wed, 25 Nov 1998 10:42:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bright@hotjobs.com) Received: from localhost (bright@localhost) by bright.fx.genx.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA17276 for ; Wed, 25 Nov 1998 13:46:51 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from bright@hotjobs.com) X-Authentication-Warning: bright.fx.genx.net: bright owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 25 Nov 1998 13:46:51 -0500 (EST) From: Alfred Perlstein X-Sender: bright@bright.fx.genx.net To: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: 3.0 FS code is really nifty. Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG It's pretty much common knowledge that Softupdates are REALLY fast. But many operations are 2.5 to 5 times faster with FreeBSD-UFS+softupd than Solaris-UFS for file creation/deletion. Quite amazing. The just for kicks benches I did were not multiuser tests though, I'm going to look at that when I have a chance. Alfred Perlstein - Programmer, HotJobs Inc. - www.hotjobs.com -- There are operating systems, and then there's FreeBSD. -- http://www.freebsd.org/ 3.0-current To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message