From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Apr 28 23:36:55 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id XAA25264 for questions-outgoing; Sun, 28 Apr 1996 23:36:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from riley-net170-164.uoregon.edu (riley-net170-164.uoregon.edu [128.223.170.164]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id XAA25255 for ; Sun, 28 Apr 1996 23:36:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from dwhite@localhost) by riley-net170-164.uoregon.edu (8.6.12/8.6.12) id XAA13758; Sun, 28 Apr 1996 23:40:14 -0700 Date: Sun, 28 Apr 1996 23:40:13 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug White Reply-To: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu To: "Brian T. Schellenberger - Personal Account" cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Kernel config file / "conflict" etc. In-Reply-To: <199604270940.FAA06388@mercury.interpath.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Sat, 27 Apr 1996, Brian T. Schellenberger - Personal Account wrote: > I don't mean to be dense, but are all the keywords in the config file > docuented someplace? The handbook has lines for lots of possible devices, > but no detailed info on, for example, "conflict." Since lpt0 and sb0 > both want IRQ 7, sb0 specifies "conflict," as per LINT. But the usual > lpt0 does not specify "conflict." Do I need to add it? LINT should have all the valid options. The Handbook also has a discussion. My guess would be yes, you need to add "conflict" to both devices in question. However, I would move my SB to irq 5 and avoid the whole mess. :) Doug White | University of Oregon Internet: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu | Residence Networking Assistant http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite | Computer Science Major