Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 12:42:38 -0400 From: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dev_t / udev_t confusion ? Message-ID: <p0602044bbceced844d18@[128.113.24.47]> In-Reply-To: <20040609124308.GC11475@green.homeunix.org> References: <53993.1086779790@critter.freebsd.dk> <20040609124308.GC11475@green.homeunix.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 8:43 AM -0400 6/9/04, Brian Feldman wrote: >On Wed, Jun 09, 2004, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > [...] >> The change proposed is more or less to do: >> s/dev_t/struct cdev */ >> s/udev_t/dev_t/ >> over all the kernel sources (366 files or so). >> [....] > >One yes vote, please. The dev_t structure is not treated as >opaque, so as long as people are going to->dereference it, it >deserves to be a struct *. This sounds like the right path to me. -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?p0602044bbceced844d18>