Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 10:38:01 +0930 From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey <grog@FreeBSD.org> To: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: Ports scheduled for removal on Nov 7 Message-ID: <20030811010801.GH83425@wantadilla.lemis.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0308101138450.19221-100000@pancho> References: <20030810062254.GA11719@rot13.obsecurity.org> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0308101138450.19221-100000@pancho>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--aAwQsp3R3A4c5Jjk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Sunday, 10 August 2003 at 11:42:08 -0500, Mark Linimon wrote: >> I think it would definitely be off-topic for freebsd-questions, but >> I'd be more open to -announce. The only thing is that port removals >> are a periodic event (I just happen to have more than usual queued up >> this time), so if I do it this time I should do it every time. > > Well, I can suggest a class of messages such as (ports scheduled > for deletion|changes to ports framework that will affect various > ports|freeze in effect|freeze lifted), possibly others. I think > there would be an audience for this mailing list who would not > otherwise be able to follow the large-volume ports mailing lists. > > freebsd-ports-announce? Given the central importance of ports to FreeBSD and the low traffic volume of -announce, I can't see any good reason for a separate list. Greg -- See complete headers for address and phone numbers --aAwQsp3R3A4c5Jjk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/NuxxIubykFB6QiMRAnJGAJ9SEO+o5pWqIDjpwTtu9hR+qZUvuACfX6EG DPvCH4Xz3r9t4BUi6klt7As= =vD5a -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --aAwQsp3R3A4c5Jjk--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030811010801.GH83425>