From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 28 22:28:12 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A243716A41C for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 22:28:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gofdx-freebsd-x11@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6169C43D49 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 22:28:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gofdx-freebsd-x11@m.gmane.org) Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1DnOR5-00083O-DP for freebsd-x11@freebsd.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 00:20:07 +0200 Received: from gn-hgk-15cd4.adsl.wanadoo.nl ([81.69.122.212]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 00:20:07 +0200 Received: from A.S.Usov by gn-hgk-15cd4.adsl.wanadoo.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 00:20:07 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org From: "Alexander S. Usov" Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 23:34:58 +0200 Organization: KVI Lines: 18 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: gn-hgk-15cd4.adsl.wanadoo.nl User-Agent: KNode/0.9.1 Sender: news Subject: QT4 perfomance. X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 22:28:12 -0000 I think I am not the first to notice it, but still I think it's worth asking :) Thanks to the final release of qt4 I decided to give it a try and to watch some of their samples. I have tried it on 2 machines, one having matrox g550 in it, and other with radeon mobility 9000. It really sucks :) I mean visually it's quite nice, but even in the mainwindow demo (the one with a bunch of docked windows in it) it feels really *slow* and eats up 100% of cpu. HW acceleration is working on both machines. Does anybody knows if it is just due to sloppy coding of the demos, or we will have to wait till next xorg release with KAA it to be able to use it? The most funny part is that it works like a charm under windows. -- Best regards, Alexander.