Date: 05 Oct 2002 18:52:51 -0500 From: "Adriel Cardenas G." <aztlanet@gmx.net> To: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> Cc: gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Evolution 1.1.1 (ok!) Message-ID: <1033861971.354.2.camel@unxstar> In-Reply-To: <1033857526.48812.11.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> References: <20021004224416.Y41592-100000@shumai.marcuscom.com> <1033857388.7217.5.camel@unxstar> <1033857526.48812.11.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
El sáb, 05-10-2002 a las 17:38, Joe Marcus Clarke escribió:
> On Sat, 2002-10-05 at 18:36, Adriel Cardenas G. wrote:
> > > > > >> I have seen this problem too on both my 4.7-rc and -current box
> > > > > > >> It apears that ldconfig does not remember the diffrent paths after a
> > > > > > >> reboot
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> locate libeutil.so.0
> > > > > > >> /usr/X11R6/lib/evolution/1.1/libeutil.so.0
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> when I run as root "ldconfig -m /usr/X11R6/lib/evolution/1.1/"
> > > > > > >> evolution starts
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> hope this helps,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >I haven't been able to reproduce this. I rebooted my 4.7-RC box and
> > > > > > >verified that /usr/X11R6/lib/evolution/1.1 was not in the ldconfig
> > > > > > path,
> > > > > > >then started Evo. It came right up. Tell me, did you build with pilot
> > > > > > >support?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Guess what?...same thing happened here, just ran as root...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "ldconfig -m /usr/X11R6/lib/evolution/1.1/"
> > > > > >
> > > > > > and that was it! Evo starts.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Do you think we should report this as part of the Evolution beta-test?
> > > > > > or what this could it be?
> > > > >
> > > > > I think this should be reported to Ximian. libeutil should be a module
> > > > > that is dynamically loaded at run time. If it was meant to be a normal
> > > > > shared library, they should install it in ${X11BASE}/lib.
> > > > >
> > > > > That said, I still can't reproduce this on my -stable machine.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > When I installed it, I didn't use the WITHOUT_PILOT argument, therefore
> > > > it has the pilot support, probably it has something to do with that.
> > >
> > > That's most likely it. The problem is most likely due to linking issues
> > > with the pilot libs.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > I'll report it to ximian.
> > >
> > > I've already reported the building problems to Ximian. Hopefully this
> > > will go away with the next beta. Please add a bug report, though. When
> > > you do, include all the errors, the fact that you're building with pilot
> > > support, and that all the modules in the evolution directory should be
> > > dynamically loaded without needing to be in the LD_LIBRARY_PATH. Thanks.
> > >
> > > As a workaround, I'll probably have to add an RC script to install that
> > > directory in the ld cache.
> > >
> > Hi I recently made an portupgrade -ra, and it upgrade this Gnome related
> > packages:
> >
> > gdk-pixbuf
> > gnomecanvas
> > gnomecontrolcenter2
> > libgtop
> > libogg
> > libvorbis
> > metacity
> > pkgconfig
> > sodipodi
> >
> > plus this ones
> >
> > Abiword
> > apache2
> > fetchmail
> > webmin
> > xchat2
> >
> > and after the portupgrade I did not have to make the explicit load of
> > /usr/X11/lib/evolution/1.1
> >
> > Funny thing, huh?
>
> Doesn't make sense, but I'll keep an eye on it when Evo 1.1.1 goes live.
You're right, it doesn't make sense at all, and more "sense-less" is
that after reboot the explicit load has to be done again in order to Evo
starts.
Adriel
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-gnome" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1033861971.354.2.camel>