From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Oct  1 00:24:02 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 025B41065670
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Sat,  1 Oct 2011 00:24:02 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from crsnet@crsnet.pl)
Received: from mx1.security.edu.pl (mx1.security.edu.pl [91.197.89.212])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4E318FC08
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Sat,  1 Oct 2011 00:24:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mx1.security.edu.pl
	([91.197.89.212] helo=poczta.i-pi.pl ident=www)
	by mx1.security.edu.pl with esmtp (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD))
	(envelope-from <crsnet@crsnet.pl>)
	id 1R9nUM-000ITG-AC; Sat, 01 Oct 2011 02:32:23 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=UTF-8;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2011 02:31:24 +0200
From: "crsnet.pl" <crsnet@crsnet.pl>
To: "Conrad J. Sabatier" <conrads@cox.net>
In-Reply-To: <20110930190726.364710ef@cox.net>
References: <588d311a0d08e016df304605b94c9a60@i-pi.pl>
	<CAH+63SS-w9h5D46LSXKEgUwEGx=iVijtNUvd-ZCPedXYTfhBJw@mail.gmail.com>
	<e5843539675aba2fb223c123659d6a2a@i-pi.pl>
	<20110930161029.87ca8fdc.hsaeki@wmail.plala.or.jp>
	<68ad2e561695c416c8f3126ed7b82a81@i-pi.pl>
	<20110930190726.364710ef@cox.net>
Message-ID: <917cb76ec75ea74b95636c382f1ea0ae@i-pi.pl>
X-Sender: crsnet@crsnet.pl
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.4.2
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 91.197.89.212
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: crsnet@crsnet.pl
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on MTA
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=7.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mx1.security.edu.pl)
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD 9-Beta3 and FlashPlayer
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2011 00:24:02 -0000

 On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 19:07:26 -0500, "Conrad J. Sabatier" 
 <conrads@cox.net> wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 09:58:48 +0200
> "crsnet.pl" <crsnet@crsnet.pl> wrote:
>
>>  On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 16:10:29 +0900, Hiroshi Saeki
>>  <hsaeki@wmail.plala.or.jp> wrote:
>> > I think that this issue is invoked by
>> > kernel of FreeBSD 9.0-BETA3.
>> >
>> > /usr/src/sys/kern/uipc_usrreq.c     1.244.2.2
>> > may have problem.
>> >
>> > I recommend you to revert older kernel.
>> >
>> > For example,
>> > downgrade to FreeBSD 9.0-BETA2, BETA1.
>> >
>> >
>> > 
>> ftp://ftp2.jp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ISO-IMAGES-amd64/9.0/FreeBSD-9.0-BETA1-amd64-disc1.iso
>> > may of your help.
>> >
>> > With  warm regards.
>> >
>>
>>  Hello.
>>  True, i boot today from my old kernel, and flash works fine.
>>  I can say in 100% that is problem with uipc, but i realy belive 
>> that
>>  Hiroshi have right.
>
> Strange, flash works fine for me under 9.0-BETA3.  Go figure.
 [cr4sh@x300 ~]$ uname -a
 FreeBSD x300 9.0-BETA3 FreeBSD 9.0-BETA3 #3: Tue Sep 27 10:47:57 CEST 
 2011     cr4sh@x300:/sys/amd64/compile/GENERIC  amd64
 For me too. But i make csup yesterday, and when i build it. I get BETA3 
 but with damaged flash.

 Regards.