Date: Mon, 15 May 2023 22:19:17 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 271371] e1000 driver falsely reports that it supports LRO Message-ID: <bug-271371-7501-jwbeCksht5@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-271371-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-271371-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D271371 Eric Joyner <erj@freebsd.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |erj@freebsd.org --- Comment #1 from Eric Joyner <erj@freebsd.org> --- I don't understand this bug? The IFCAP_LRO capability gets passed to iflib via the isc_capenable/isc_capabilities fields via the driver's if_softc_ctx_t objec= t, then those are used in a if_setcapabilities/if_setcapenable() call in iflib when the driver loads. Then iflib sets up the lro context and handles sendi= ng packets via LRO's tcp_lro_rx() instead of the regular if_input() routine. iflib ends up handling most of it, but the driver still needs to set IFCAP_= LRO if it wants iflib to use LRO. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-271371-7501-jwbeCksht5>