From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Sep 29 08:46:56 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id IAA13501 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Tue, 29 Sep 1998 08:46:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from laker.net (jet.laker.net [205.245.74.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA13478 for ; Tue, 29 Sep 1998 08:46:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sfriedri@laker.net) Received: from nt (digital-pbi-142.laker.net [208.0.233.42]) by laker.net (8.9.0/8.9.LAKERNET.NO-SPAM.SPAMMERS.AND.RELAYS.WILL.BE.TRACKED.AND.PROSECUTED.) with SMTP id LAA20953; Tue, 29 Sep 1998 11:46:20 -0400 Message-Id: <199809291546.LAA20953@laker.net> From: "Steve Friedrich" To: "Chris Shenton" , "wwoods@cybcon.com" Cc: "questions@FreeBSD.ORG" Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1998 10:41:57 -0400 Reply-To: "Steve Friedrich" X-Mailer: PMMail 98 Professional (2.01.1600) For Windows NT (4.0.1381;3) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: This a decent system for FreeBSD? Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 29 Sep 1998 09:44:57 -0400, Chris Shenton wrote: >Computer HW is such a bad investment, but they're so cheap I can't >help myself! They're not an investment. They're "consumables". Unix systems measure "uptime" in years, Winblows measures it in minutes. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message