From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Sep 26 16:11:34 2003
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 6A6DB16A4B3; Fri, 26 Sep 2003 16:11:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rwcrmhc13.comcast.net (rwcrmhc13.comcast.net [204.127.198.39])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id CF1FC43FE9; Fri, 26 Sep 2003 16:11:33 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from kolmeronline@comcast.net)
Received: from 204.127.197.116 ([204.127.197.116])
          by comcast.net (rwcrmhc13) with SMTP
          id <2003092623113301500as6nie>; Fri, 26 Sep 2003 23:11:33 +0000
Received: from [12.246.2.55] by 204.127.197.116;
	Fri, 26 Sep 2003 23:11:33 +0000
From: kolmeronline@comcast.net
To: Sam Leffler <sam@errno.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 23:11:33 +0000
X-Mailer: AT&T Message Center Version 1 (Sep 12 2003)
X-Authenticated-Sender: a29sbWVyb25saW5lQGNvbWNhc3QubmV0
Message-Id: <20030926231133.CF1FC43FE9@mx1.FreeBSD.org>
cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org
cc: "Jeroen C.van Gelderen" <jeroen@vangelderen.org>
cc: src-committers@freebsd.org
cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org
cc: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org>
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc/defaults devfs.rules
X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree <cvs-src.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-src>,
	<mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-src@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-src>,
	<mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 23:11:34 -0000

Don't know how you picked up our email address but we are not SUBSCRIBED 
members .... have tried thru cvs to be removed with no success - please remove 
us immediately.

Thank you.
> > My basic point is that this change may make any hardware weaknesses that
> > we don't address more fatal by giving hostile users access to the
> > hardware.  I don't object to the change but just wanted to question
> > whether we've written our drivers and evaluated our hardware with this
> > threat model in mind.
> 
> The crypto support hasn't been written with that in mind.  I'd welcome
> critique and/or fixes.
> 
> 	Sam
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "cvs-all-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>