From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Nov  9 08:02:02 2011
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 821DF106564A;
	Wed,  9 Nov 2011 08:02:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from flo@freebsd.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org
	[IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B0358FC13;
	Wed,  9 Nov 2011 08:02:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from bender.solomo.local (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pA9820RP040119;
	Wed, 9 Nov 2011 08:02:01 GMT (envelope-from flo@freebsd.org)
Message-ID: <4EBA3378.5040904@freebsd.org>
Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2011 09:02:00 +0100
From: Florian Smeets <flo@freebsd.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
	rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111024 Thunderbird/7.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org>
References: <201111072338.pA7NcnGG069162@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<4EB877EF.3080902@FreeBSD.org> <4EB9D3D7.8000009@FreeBSD.org>
	<4EB9F04A.6020003@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <4EB9F04A.6020003@FreeBSD.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: undefined
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@freebsd.org>, cvs-ports@freebsd.org,
	cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net Makefile ports/net/asterisk14 Makefile
 distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist ports/net/asterisk14/files asterisk.sh.in
 codecnego-patch-Makefile
 dtmf_debug.diff ilbc_enable.diff nocodecnego-patch-Makefile
 patch-Makefile.rules ...
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: **OBSOLETE** CVS commit messages for the entire tree
	<cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2011 08:02:02 -0000

On 09.11.2011 04:15, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 11/08/2011 17:13, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
>> On 11/7/2011 4:29 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
>>> Given that we already have 1.6 and 1.8 in ports, what's the value of
>>> having this much older version?
>>>
>>> I didn't hear one single request to spare it when I deprecated it many
>>> months ago, and it's been completely gone for over 3 weeks now. Have
>>> users been asking for it to be returned?
>>
>> There is a reason why Digium still makes security releases of that
>> software. And we still have 1.0 and 1.2 in the tree, so why not 1.4?
>> IMHO, 1.4 should stay at least until 1.0 and 1.2 get booted.
> 
> I'm only seeing 1.0, but in any case I don't see this as a reason to go
> in the wrong direction. :)  However ...
> 

1.0 is actually 10, the version after 1.8 (They changed the version
numbering). I know it can be confusing, but i did not want to call the
port asterisk100, if anybody has a better idea let me know.

1.4 is the oldest version we have in the tree and as long as it's kept
up to date it should IMHO stay. 1.4 is a LTS release which will be
supported until April of next year. This gives people a bit more time to
migrate to the next LTS release, which is 1.8.

Cheers,
Florian