From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Mar 31 10: 8:25 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from thelab.hub.org (nat192.236.mpoweredpc.net [142.177.192.236]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FE0B150DE; Wed, 31 Mar 1999 10:07:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from localhost (scrappy@localhost) by thelab.hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA80229; Wed, 31 Mar 1999 14:07:11 -0400 (AST) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) X-Authentication-Warning: thelab.hub.org: scrappy owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 31 Mar 1999 14:07:11 -0400 (AST) From: The Hermit Hacker To: Satoshi - the Wraith - Asami Cc: nbm@mithrandr.moria.org, nclayton@lehman.com, ports@FreeBSD.ORG, nik@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: GNU Stow, and the ports system? In-Reply-To: <199903302217.OAA41059@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, 30 Mar 1999, Satoshi - the Wraith - Asami wrote: > * From: Neil Blakey-Milner > * Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG, nik@FreeBSD.ORG > * > * On Tue 1999-03-30 (08:56), nclayton@lehman.com wrote: > * > Now, obviously I could just do this myself (and probably will when my > * > 3.1 box finishes rebuilding itself). But would anyone be interested in > * > having this functionality folded back into the ports system as an option? > > As an option? Heck, I'd like to see it as the default. :) Please make it an option...its taken me two years to finally eliminate it from our servers here at work...I'd hate to have to start all over again with FreeBSD :( Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy Systems Administrator @ hub.org primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message