From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 22 07:47:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA36A16A407 for ; Fri, 22 Sep 2006 07:47:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lulf@stud.ntnu.no) Received: from signal.itea.ntnu.no (signal.itea.ntnu.no [129.241.190.231]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C166F43D78 for ; Fri, 22 Sep 2006 07:47:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lulf@stud.ntnu.no) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by signal.itea.ntnu.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7D8F33DEF for ; Fri, 22 Sep 2006 09:47:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from gaupe.stud.ntnu.no (gaupe.stud.ntnu.no [129.241.56.184]) by signal.itea.ntnu.no (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Fri, 22 Sep 2006 09:47:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: by gaupe.stud.ntnu.no (Postfix, from userid 2312) id D8CA3D000C; Fri, 22 Sep 2006 09:47:38 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 09:47:38 +0200 From: Ulf Lilleengen To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060922074738.GB1847@stud.ntnu.no> References: <45122531.6010503@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20060921093038.57966.qmail@web30303.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20060921200909.GA13927@megan.kiwi-computer.com> <20060922074428.GA1847@stud.ntnu.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060922074428.GA1847@stud.ntnu.no> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Content-Scanned: with sophos and spamassassin at mailgw.ntnu.no. Subject: Re: geom - help ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 07:47:45 -0000 On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 09:44:28AM +0200, Ulf Lilleengen wrote: > Well, I can assure you that you're not alone :) I'm dedicating much of my > left-over time to work on gvinum, and you can see some of what I've been working > on in the last status report. Some of this will hopefully come into CURRENT soon > as Greg Lehey have had the time too review some patches. I'm almost done with > the concat command too, but everytime I'm working on gvinum i bump into many > things that could have been done better in terms of abstraction. > > More on this can be found here: > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/2006-August/005592.html > > As mentioned later in that post, a new type of volume manager should be designed > to replace gvinum in the future. But it's still important to improve gvinum > because of that fact that many still uses it. I'm sorry I didn't see any subsequent replies in my mutt so i thought no one hat answered. Clearly I was wrong :) -- Ulf Lilleengen