Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2001 15:11:46 +0000 From: Kevin Way <kevin.way@overtone.org> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: :q:q![kevin.way@overtone.org: Re: import NetBSD rc system] Message-ID: <20010901151146.A53543@bean.overtone.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
----- Forwarded message from Kevin Way <kevin.way@overtone.org> ----- Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 06:34:26 +0000 From: Kevin Way <kevin.way@overtone.org> To: Gordon Tetlow <gordont@gnf.org> Subject: Re: import NetBSD rc system On Mon, Aug 13, 2001 at 11:10:43PM -0700, Gordon Tetlow wrote: > Here's my big question. Do we try to maintain our boot order? Or are we > going to go with the boot order as presented by the NetBSD stuff? I don't see any reason to force the boot order to be maintained. As long as the dependancies are set correctly, i'd think the boot order would be determined solely by the output of rcorder. What am I missing? -Kevin Way ----- End forwarded message ----- -- If it weren't for my horse, I wouldn't have spent that year in college. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010901151146.A53543>