From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Jan 27 17:38:27 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA07887 for questions-outgoing; Tue, 27 Jan 1998 17:38:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from phoenix.welearn.com.au (suebla.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.44.81]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA07822 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 1998 17:37:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sue@phoenix.welearn.com.au) Received: (from sue@localhost) by phoenix.welearn.com.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) id MAA01476; Wed, 28 Jan 1998 12:37:22 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: <19980128123721.53382@welearn.com.au> Date: Wed, 28 Jan 1998 12:37:21 +1100 From: Sue Blake To: Jay Nelson Cc: Greg Lehey , FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: How do I read RTF ("Rich Text Format")? References: <19980128105457.48663@welearn.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.88e In-Reply-To: ; from Jay Nelson on Tue, Jan 27, 1998 at 06:50:55PM -0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk On Tue, Jan 27, 1998 at 06:50:55PM -0600, Jay Nelson wrote: > Sue, > > Do you know if the current RTF specs at M$ are valid for the latest > iterations of Word? Sorry, no. And there was two versions of the specs, one a dozen pages and one a half inch of paper, and some notes on it when I spent a day searching ages ago. If it's still in the paper recycler I'll holler. > I've bumped into this enough, I may try do do something. Is there any > consensus on what output format everyone needs? I doubt there'd be consensus, but even plain text would help to read email. -- Regards, -*Sue*-