Date: Thu, 7 Aug 1997 19:43:36 -0700 From: John-Mark Gurney <gurney_j@efn.org> To: Tom Samplonius <tom@sdf.com> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: AUTO_EOI_* ? Message-ID: <19970807194336.27057@hydrogen.nike.efn.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.970807190930.24596C-100000@misery.sdf.com>; from Tom Samplonius on Thu, Aug 07, 1997 at 07:12:34PM -0700 References: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.970807190930.24596C-100000@misery.sdf.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Tom Samplonius scribbled this message on Aug 7: > > It seems that the AUTO_EOI_* options might speed interupt handling. > I've tried them on some motherboards, and they seem to work ok. Are these > options recommended? I've seen some talk that these options should be > eliminated? well... don't make AUTO_EOI_2 enabled by default... I have a motherboard that dies when this option is enabled... though I haven't found one yet when AUTO_EOI_1 is enabled... the comments say that AUTO_EOI_1 will break suspend/resume on some notebooks... so it looks like we can't enable both by default... -- John-Mark Gurney Modem/FAX: +1 541 683 6954 Cu Networking Live in Peace, destroy Micro$oft, support free software, run FreeBSD
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19970807194336.27057>