From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Sep 17 01:21:27 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id BAA28881
          for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 17 Sep 1997 01:21:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [204.188.121.18])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id BAA28874
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 17 Sep 1997 01:21:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.star-gate.com [127.0.0.1])
	by rah.star-gate.com (8.8.7/8.8.5) with ESMTP id BAA01019;
	Wed, 17 Sep 1997 01:21:03 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199709170821.BAA01019@rah.star-gate.com>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0gamma 1/27/96
To: Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com>
cc: Eivind Eklund <perhaps@yes.no>,
        Joerg Wunsch <joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Kernel clock runs inaccurately 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 17 Sep 1997 17:15:03 +0930."
             <19970917171503.14900@lemis.com> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 1997 01:21:03 -0700
From: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

I had a  centrex line perhaps my 20ms figure is low however it was not
that much higher and for sure way less than a second.
I pulling this figure from over a year ago...

	Cheers,
	Amancio

>From The Desk Of Greg Lehey :
> On Wed, Sep 17, 1997 at 12:35:53AM -0700, Amancio Hasty wrote:
> > I guess it depens on your ISDN switch  it used to take me
> > 20ms 
> 
> How did you measure that?  At 64 kb/s, 20 ms means 160 bytes at full
> speed.  Call setup takes about 6 messages.  I don't think you can do
> that in 160 bytes.
> 
> > now is probably closer to a second --- my guess is that PacBell did
> > an upgrade 8)
> 
> Greg