From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Apr 20 10:50:57 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id KAA03468 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 20 Apr 1995 10:50:57 -0700 Received: from cs.weber.edu (cs.weber.edu [137.190.16.16]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id KAA03462 for ; Thu, 20 Apr 1995 10:50:55 -0700 Received: by cs.weber.edu (4.1/SMI-4.1.1) id AA25597; Thu, 20 Apr 95 11:44:22 MDT From: terry@cs.weber.edu (Terry Lambert) Message-Id: <9504201744.AA25597@cs.weber.edu> Subject: Re: Q: Does anyone know about implementing LAT support? To: osyjm@cdsnet.net (Jaye Mathisen) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 95 11:44:21 MDT Cc: root@deadline.snafu.de, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: from "Jaye Mathisen" at Apr 19, 95 10:40:40 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4dev PL52] Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > I believe the DECServers, if downloaded by a VAX, will also support > > non-LAT CTERM protocol connections -- CTERM is much easier to implement, > > and you can buy the documentation for it and the underlying protocols > > for about $180.00 for all the books you would need. > > This is incorrect. If you have a DEC server 200, you are stuck with LAT > only. If you have 700's, or 900TM's, you can get LAT, SLIp, PPP, and > a couple others, but no DECnet. Oh, bletch, you're right; this was the modem server that I worked on that did that. Sorryy. 8-(. Terry Lambert terry@cs.weber.edu --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.