From owner-freebsd-arch Mon Apr 1 8:36: 7 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [204.156.12.50]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39F3B37B41A; Mon, 1 Apr 2002 08:36:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (arr@localhost) by fledge.watson.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g31GZtU11290; Mon, 1 Apr 2002 11:35:55 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from arr@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: fledge.watson.org: arr owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2002 11:35:54 -0500 (EST) From: "Andrew R. Reiter" X-Sender: arr@fledge.watson.org To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Cc: "Andrew R. Reiter" , "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" , arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: mutex profiling In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 1 Apr 2002, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: :"Andrew R. Reiter" writes: :> Can we perhaps have the ability to dump the lock char * description? Or :> are you doing this way b/c you can get the file and line #'s? Looks good, :> tho. : :I can get both; I'm doing it this way because Eivind did it this way :and it didn't occur to me to change it. Is one preferrable to the :other? : Well, I guess that the file and line number is of more use than lock name, especially for what we want to use this information for. If others find that information more helpful, then perhaps we should think about it further, otherwise, I think what you and Eivind have worked up should be useful. Thanks. Cheers, Andrew -- Andrew R. Reiter arr@watson.org arr@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message