From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 11 16:08:48 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE61116A4D0 for ; Thu, 11 Nov 2004 16:08:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.seekingfire.com (coyote.seekingfire.com [24.72.10.212]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A92CB43D1F for ; Thu, 11 Nov 2004 16:08:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tillman@seekingfire.com) Received: by mail.seekingfire.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 2242A92; Thu, 11 Nov 2004 10:08:48 -0600 (CST) Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 10:08:47 -0600 From: Tillman Hodgson To: stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20041111160847.GV33689@seekingfire.com> References: <1100144231.79614.18.camel@zircon> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1100144231.79614.18.camel@zircon> X-Habeas-SWE-1: winter into spring X-Habeas-SWE-2: brightly anticipated X-Habeas-SWE-3: like Habeas SWE (tm) X-Habeas-SWE-4: Copyright 2002 Habeas (tm) X-Habeas-SWE-5: Sender Warranted Email (SWE) (tm). The sender of this X-Habeas-SWE-6: email in exchange for a license for this Habeas X-Habeas-SWE-7: warrant mark warrants that this is a Habeas Compliant X-Habeas-SWE-8: Message (HCM) and not spam. Please report use of this X-Habeas-SWE-9: mark in spam to . X-GPG-Key-ID: 828AFC7B X-GPG-Fingerprint: 5584 14BA C9EB 1524 0E68 F543 0F0A 7FBC 828A FC7B X-GPG-Key: http://www.seekingfire.com/personal/gpg_key.asc X-Urban-Legend: There is lots of hidden information in headers X-Tillman-rules: yes he does User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Subject: Re: Heimdal version in system is ancient! X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 16:08:49 -0000 On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 07:37:11PM -0800, Joe Kelsey wrote: > Why is the version of Heimdal in the base system 0.5.1? > > The port has 0.6.1 in /usr/ports/security/heimdal. > > How are we supposed to do any useful work when the system version of a > product is in direct conflict with a port version? If the system version is sufficient for your needs, use it. If you require the version in the ports, use that. There is no "direct conflict", they install to different locations. > How do I get the latest version of Heimdal into the system? Install the port and change your $PATH. The system version doesn't include everything that the port has so you'll likely want to do that anyway. -T -- One monk said to the other, "The fish has flopped out of the net! How will it live?" The other said, "When you have gotten out of the net, I'll tell you."