From owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 1 13:00:12 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D70C37B401 for ; Thu, 1 May 2003 13:00:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sax.sax.de (sax.sax.de [193.175.26.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5774743FA3 for ; Thu, 1 May 2003 13:00:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from j@uriah.heep.sax.de) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by sax.sax.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with UUCP id WAA26867 for freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org; Thu, 1 May 2003 22:00:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from uriah.heep.sax.de (localhost.heep.sax.de [127.0.0.1]) by uriah.heep.sax.de (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h41Jvc4Z036112 for ; Thu, 1 May 2003 21:57:38 +0200 (MET DST) (envelope-from j@uriah.heep.sax.de) Received: (from j@localhost) by uriah.heep.sax.de (8.12.9/8.12.6/Submit) id h41JvcT0036111 for freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org; Thu, 1 May 2003 21:57:38 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 21:57:38 +0200 From: Joerg Wunsch To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20030501215738.B35452@uriah.heep.sax.de> Mail-Followup-To: Joerg Wunsch , freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org References: <200305011359.h41DxPJJ023503@uriah.heep.sax.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from nate@root.org on Thu, May 01, 2003 at 10:21:04AM -0700 X-Phone: +49-351-2012 669 X-PGP-Fingerprint: DC 47 E6 E4 FF A6 E9 8F 93 21 E0 7D F9 12 D6 4E Subject: Re: Invalidating/reattaching a volume (was: relocation info) X-BeenThere: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Joerg Wunsch List-Id: SCSI subsystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 May 2003 20:00:12 -0000 As Nate Lawson wrote: > I'd also like to see your camcontrol detach patches and a path for > vinum to lose and then reattach a volume. Whether the latter should > happen at the CAM layer or the vinum layer is up for discussion. I think that could/should be handled in vinum, yes. -- cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)