Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2021 23:29:01 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 253275] [exp-run] base system PIE default Message-ID: <bug-253275-7788-aLhI6KYJor@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-253275-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-253275-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D253275 dewayne@heuristicsystems.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dewayne@heuristicsystems.co | |m.au --- Comment #13 from dewayne@heuristicsystems.com.au --- (In reply to mjl from comment #11) MJL, to your question. There isn't a bad interaction between -fcommon and -fPIE. We build our 1400+ ports for i386 and amd64 without issue. We explicitly require -fcommon for all ports but disable it as needed, similar= ly for -fPIE. Though many ports that fail to build with -fPIE usually build w= ith -fPIC. Few require both to be disabled. (The gcc10 man page is excellent in describing these directives=20 https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=3Dgcc10&apropos=3D0&sektion=3D0&m= anpath=3DFreeBSD+12.2-RELEASE+and+Ports&arch=3Ddefault&format=3Dhtml ) We also run everything under aslr ;) --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-253275-7788-aLhI6KYJor>