From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 21 02:12:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: openoffice@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1083A16A4DD for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 02:12:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sean@mcneil.com) Received: from mail.mcneil.com (mcneil.com [24.199.45.54]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07FEF43D45 for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 02:12:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sean@mcneil.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.mcneil.com [127.0.0.1]) by mail.mcneil.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A54E8F1C03 for ; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 19:12:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mcneil.com Received: from mail.mcneil.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (triton.mcneil.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RjXjPAYUSLP0 for ; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 19:12:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mcneil.com (mcneil.com [24.199.45.54]) by mail.mcneil.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 096DCF1B5E for ; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 19:12:44 -0700 (PDT) From: Sean McNeil To: openoffice@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 19:12:44 -0700 Message-Id: <1156126364.41584.11.camel@triton.mcneil.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: update of OO to 2.0.4_m1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 02:12:59 -0000 As many people have noticed and Maho has indicated, OO-2.0 was update but apparently without much concern as to whether it actually builds. So far, we have the following observations: on i386 and amd64 platforms, it fails because patch-i* changes appear to be obsolete and either need to be updated or removed if no longer necessary. on 6.1-STABLE as of 601103, the prototype for re-entrant routine gethostbyname_r was added to netdb.h. This requires changes to code that look for -CURRENT 700015 to instead look for 601103. There are some emails about this already with a patch. After removing patch-i* and adding 601103 changes, OO still fails to build on amd64. It looks like a problem with the sleepycat JNI interface. I get java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Invalid argument at com.sleepycat.db.db_javaJNI.Db_open0(Native Method) at com.sleepycat.db.Db.open0(Db.java:4499) at com.sleepycat.db.Db.open(Db.java:491) at com.sun.star.help.HelpLinker.link(HelpLinker.java:370) at com.sun.star.help.HelpLinker.main(HelpLinker.java:228) dmake: Error code 1, while making '../../unxfbsdx.pro/bin/sbasic_en-US.zip' '---* tg_merge.mk *---' ERROR: Error 65280 occurred while making /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2.0/work/OOD680_m1/helpcontent2/util/sbasic IMHO, OO-2.0 should not have been updated without first verifying that it (at a minimum) builds on both supported platforms (i.e. i386 and amd64). It takes forever for OO to build and causes some consternation when doing a portupgrade. Cheers, Sean